The Future of the SOC 2?
The Future of the SOC 2?
I know this has been discussed a lot, but I do Think we agree the SOC 2 needs some teams added to the mix.
My best proposal for the SOC2..
Wheelersburg
Waverly
West
Valley
Minford
(If possible) Add: Piketon, and Oak Hill OR Northwest to make it 7 teams. This would help to keep teams from possibly having future 9 game schedules.
My best proposal for the SOC2..
Wheelersburg
Waverly
West
Valley
Minford
(If possible) Add: Piketon, and Oak Hill OR Northwest to make it 7 teams. This would help to keep teams from possibly having future 9 game schedules.
- GoBucks1047
- Varsity
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:44 am
- Location: Scioto County
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Geographically, Piketon makes good sense. Competitively, not so much, not to mention Piketon has been in the SVC for 53 years and the SVC has been the same for 29 years; 40 years if you count out Bishop Flaget, who was apart of the then 9-team SVC from 1975-86. I don't see Piketon leaving anytime soon. Plus wouldn't 7 teams just bring back the same 9-game season issue SOC II would be trying to avoid in the 1st place. I'd say stick with you latter option of moving Northwest or Oak Hill up and make an even 6 teams for SOC I and SOC II unless Portsmouth would somehow join the SOC, which probably isn't going to happen anyway now since they're in the OVC.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:58 pm
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
I don't think Piketon would come in a million years. They have a chance each year to compete for the SVC in most sports...SOC...not so much! The SOC has had many opportunities in the past to add Portsmouth, and now they're gone to the OVC. In my opinion, it's our loss.
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
I am not sure where the SOC is going to get any teams at this point. They had a chance to grab Portsmouth and Ironton a few years back and passed on them. This I think will be important over the next few years to see what new teams might join this league.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:58 pm
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Being in the SOC is a blessing and a curse. Teams know that if they come play in our league, they're going to get "punched in the mouth." Not everybody wants to do that year in and year out. Also, I think having Wheelersburg hurts the league's chances to add lesser schools. I for one love having the Pirates in our league...I think it gives our league a real legitimacy having a team with such a sustained record for excellence. But, for a new team coming in, you know they're going to be really good in almost everything year in and year out...not everybody wants the bar set that high.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:58 pm
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
And teams that could compete would never be voted in by the smaller SOC schools.
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Jackson would be a good fit! Also I wish ironton would have got in. Not really sure what the future looks like for the soc. I know burg had a hard time getting 10 games this season...
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
This is the biggest problem.....oldschoolqb wrote:And teams that could compete would never be voted in by the smaller SOC schools.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:58 pm
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
I agree BurgGrad. I really wish Ironton and Portsmouth would have got in. And, you're right, Jackson would be a great fit, but...^^^^^^. In fact, we even dropped them from the schedule this year.
- doubleplay643
- S
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Thanks for thinking of us BurgGrad6.BurgGrad6 wrote:Jackson would be a good fit! Also I wish ironton would have got in. Not really sure what the future looks like for the soc. I know burg had a hard time getting 10 games this season...
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Changes need to be made in the league. Oak Hill & Northwest shouldn't be playing in the SOS I in football, but moving to SOC II wouldn't be a good move for them at this time. The SOC II has been dominated by Wheelersburg with this years' championship being their 30th since 1972.
According to burg fan.com their all time record against current league members is Minford 54-6, Portsmouth West 36-20, Waverly 38-17, and Valley 35-5. They are also 46-8 against Northwest. Burg fan lists them as 7-2 against Oak Hill although this appears to be more recent games not actually all time.
I think a third division with a possible merger with the OVC for at least football could be an answer, but if the OVC continues to be as competitive as it was this year they wouldn't have much of a reason to agree to that.
According to burg fan.com their all time record against current league members is Minford 54-6, Portsmouth West 36-20, Waverly 38-17, and Valley 35-5. They are also 46-8 against Northwest. Burg fan lists them as 7-2 against Oak Hill although this appears to be more recent games not actually all time.
I think a third division with a possible merger with the OVC for at least football could be an answer, but if the OVC continues to be as competitive as it was this year they wouldn't have much of a reason to agree to that.
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Well Crap. All my old posts about this subject are gone now. I don't think I have enough strength to type it all out again... But I'll try.
I knew I should've copied that a long time ago!!
If Gallia is in the OVC now, I'm not sure I like this as much as I once did. But.....
Combine the SOC And OVC....
Make a 3 division Power Conference
Division 1
Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg
West
Waverly
Gallipolis
Rock Hill
Division 2
Chesapeake
Coal Grove
Fairland
Oak Hill
Minford
Valley
Northwest
South Point
Division 3
Green
Symmes Valley
East
South Gallia
Notre Dame
Eastern
Now.... You would be required to play 6 or 7 division games and crown champions in all 3 divisions. That's fine. But this gives you flexibility to schedule who you want in your other 3 or 4 games. There is a huge advantage in doing this. If you see a 3 or 4 year slump coming in your program, you can schedule down or if you see good years coming, then you can schedule UP.... This would give all the schools with playoff aspirations the best chance to reach the playoffs!!! Playoffs have become bigger in many ppl's minds than conference anyway. Did you see where East made it this year finishing 4th in the SOC 1..? They shouldn't have been the only ones. Most of this is a product of scheduling. You'll still have division champions, and that's great!!! But This will assure every team their best chance at a 10 game schedule every year!! The SOC could dictate the whole thing!!! They could wait until the deadline every year and schedule the conference games to give each team enough points to play for to reach week 11.....
It would also give every team the best chance to schedule their non conference rivals as they want. Weeks 1 2 3 and 4 would be non conference weeks in Div 1 and 3. Div 2 would have only 3 non conference games. But those would all be early season games and would be filled much easier. Maybe they would all come from within anyway.
If Valley sees a good year coming, they play their division, then get Wheelersburg, West and Portsmouth to fill it out. If they see bad years coming, they may go the other way. Each team could rate themselves and be rated before the season starts. Then you schedule.. I think it would be amazing and create lots of playoff chances across the board!! I realize with Gallia in, the travel would be rough. Maybe this isn't best for all sports? I don't know. But I do know or think that it's perfect for Football and getting the maximum amount of teams from your conference in the playoffs...
I knew I should've copied that a long time ago!!
If Gallia is in the OVC now, I'm not sure I like this as much as I once did. But.....
Combine the SOC And OVC....
Make a 3 division Power Conference
Division 1
Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg
West
Waverly
Gallipolis
Rock Hill
Division 2
Chesapeake
Coal Grove
Fairland
Oak Hill
Minford
Valley
Northwest
South Point
Division 3
Green
Symmes Valley
East
South Gallia
Notre Dame
Eastern
Now.... You would be required to play 6 or 7 division games and crown champions in all 3 divisions. That's fine. But this gives you flexibility to schedule who you want in your other 3 or 4 games. There is a huge advantage in doing this. If you see a 3 or 4 year slump coming in your program, you can schedule down or if you see good years coming, then you can schedule UP.... This would give all the schools with playoff aspirations the best chance to reach the playoffs!!! Playoffs have become bigger in many ppl's minds than conference anyway. Did you see where East made it this year finishing 4th in the SOC 1..? They shouldn't have been the only ones. Most of this is a product of scheduling. You'll still have division champions, and that's great!!! But This will assure every team their best chance at a 10 game schedule every year!! The SOC could dictate the whole thing!!! They could wait until the deadline every year and schedule the conference games to give each team enough points to play for to reach week 11.....
It would also give every team the best chance to schedule their non conference rivals as they want. Weeks 1 2 3 and 4 would be non conference weeks in Div 1 and 3. Div 2 would have only 3 non conference games. But those would all be early season games and would be filled much easier. Maybe they would all come from within anyway.
If Valley sees a good year coming, they play their division, then get Wheelersburg, West and Portsmouth to fill it out. If they see bad years coming, they may go the other way. Each team could rate themselves and be rated before the season starts. Then you schedule.. I think it would be amazing and create lots of playoff chances across the board!! I realize with Gallia in, the travel would be rough. Maybe this isn't best for all sports? I don't know. But I do know or think that it's perfect for Football and getting the maximum amount of teams from your conference in the playoffs...
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
I like the ovc as is. I think you go back to enrollment for soc. Move NW or OH up. Jackson is just too big but it might be a decent fit for soc. Who has won the soc 1 since NW has been in it?
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Northwest, Oak Hill & Symmes Valley shared the title last year. Oak Hill won it this year.
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
If it was based on enrollment Valley would be in the SOC I unless Northwest & Oak Hill both moved to the SOC II with them.
Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Jackson is looking, wants in a league other than SEOAL (3 teams now including Jackson) … I don't see Gallia moving again leaving the OVC … Portsmouth? not sure how they would respond based on how they have been treated by the SOC in the past - they might just thumb their noses at an invite … Ironton ? they have been in a revolving door of leagues LOL … they would not have an issue with jumping to yet ANOTHER league imo …


Re: The Future of the SOC 2?
Valley will wish they were in SOC I the next several yearsone Oak wrote:If it was based on enrollment Valley would be in the SOC I unless Northwest & Oak Hill both moved to the SOC II with them.