OHSAA In Conflict With Student-Athlete Endorsement Referendum Item To Be Voted On

[radiodavel]

OHSAA In Conflict With Student-Athlete Endorsement Referendum Item To Be Voted On
https://statelinesportsnetwork.net/2022 ... e-voted-on

[OVCFan1]

The OHSAA is about one thing and one thing only: Money. The decisions they make is either about generating money or not paying money and this is another of those decisions. With the NCAA already allowing this, they realize they must now conform as well, unless they want to deal with lawsuits. And lawsuits and litigation need attorneys and attorneys cost money. The OHSAA is simply making a decision on how not to lose the money we all know they work so, so hard to get...

And no, the OHSAA does NOT have to play by the same rules they impose on the athletes. At the end of the day the Pimp gets the majority of the $$$.

[Omega]

The OHSAA is about one thing and one thing only: Money. The decisions they make is either about generating money or not paying money and this is another of those decisions. With the NCAA already allowing this, they realize they must now conform as well, unless they want to deal with lawsuits. And lawsuits and litigation need attorneys and attorneys cost money. The OHSAA is simply making a decision on how not to lose the money we all know they work so, so hard to get...

And no, the OHSAA does NOT have to play by the same rules they impose on the athletes. At the end of the day the Pimp gets the majority of the $$$.

I understand the intense dislike of all things OHSAA, especially their worship of cash flow. Yet I think one of the proposed by-law changes would allow a student athlete to profit from the use of their name, image, or likeness as long as school or OHSAA logos are not used. Would this not be a good thing and not put any profit derived in the hands of the student and not the state group.

https://statelinesportsnetwork.net/2022 ... dum-items/

[Orange and Brown]

The OHSAA is about one thing and one thing only: Money. The decisions they make is either about generating money or not paying money and this is another of those decisions. With the NCAA already allowing this, they realize they must now conform as well, unless they want to deal with lawsuits. And lawsuits and litigation need attorneys and attorneys cost money. The OHSAA is simply making a decision on how not to lose the money we all know they work so, so hard to get...

And no, the OHSAA does NOT have to play by the same rules they impose on the athletes. At the end of the day the Pimp gets the majority of the $$$.

I understand the intense dislike of all things OHSAA, especially their worship of cash flow. Yet I think one of the proposed by-law changes would allow a student athlete to profit from the use of their name, image, or likeness as long as school or OHSAA logos are not used. Would this not be a good thing and not put any profit derived in the hands of the student and not the state group.

https://statelinesportsnetwork.net/2022 ... dum-items/

That will just become a recruiting tool.