Great info. Outside of the 7/8 seeds, none of this was competitive.91raider97bobcat wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 7:27 pm
Based on that, I would say the original proposal of 12 teams in would be the right idea. A total of 9 teams that were 13-16 seeds won. Now some of those games were close, or maybe even closer than the final indicated. But without really digging into it, I have no idea how many of those 9 might be able to win a second game.
Even with the 4 seeds losing 25% of the time, their average was a 36-18 winning score. This tells me that the 21 wins by 4 seeds were lopsided wins.
Our team always gets questioned about if we're scheduling hard enough teams. You also have to question if some schools are making their schedules too hard, hurting their playoff chances by scheduling up so much that your players don't actually get the credit they deserve for how good they are.