Page 1 of 2
Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:00 am
by OZZIEOHIO
As a fan of niether team, I thought it was a pretty good game.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:19 am
by Bassmaster
I've watched all 43 Super Bowls and it is by far my favorite

Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:22 am
by ace63
It was good. I liked it. As long as its not a blow out , its a good superbowl.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:25 am
by OZZIEOHIO
Thats what I thought. If you had a football Pool on it, it was crazy.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:03 am
by Mouth's Better Half
I enjoyed it. I was rooting for the under dog Cardianals and I really thought they were going to pull one out. We had some good eats, and the kids enjoyed their 3-d glasses, and it was family fun.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:32 pm
by Bassmaster
One vote that it was a terrible game.....

Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:07 pm
by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
i thought it was great. i was rooting for the cards, but i'm an afc guy. i tend to root for underdogs. but i knew on paper, they were dead even. i felt the steelers would pull out a squeaker. and they did.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:50 pm
by LICKING COUNTY FAN
Take the fact that the refs stunk as bad if not worse than pro wrestling refs and the game could have been great. That fact allows me only to say the game was horrible.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:35 pm
by seofan_via_dublin
Bassmaster wrote:One vote that it was a terrible game.....

Then
newarkcatholicfan wrote:Take the fact that the refs stunk as bad if not worse than pro wrestling refs and the game could have been great. That fact allows me only to say the game was horrible.
Figures
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:00 pm
by Just_A_Fan
Yeah, I didn't care to much for the game either. Alot of bad calls against the Cards, and the one thing I dont understand is WHY did they not review Kurt Warners "fumble" at the end. To me his arm was going foward and would have been an incomplete pass. The TV commercials where pretty bad this year. The whole 3D thing was WAY over rated only one part was 3D.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:03 pm
by OZZIEOHIO
I thought the Steelers got the bad calls.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:48 pm
by BBallin fool
GO STEELERS!!!!
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:27 pm
by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
BBallin fool wrote:GO STEELERS!!!!
----------------------------- definately you can be proud, heck i would be if i liked the steelers. i guess the only good that came of it, was as a bengals fan, they are now the all time leaders in super bowl wins. i can't stand the 49ers. yees , because they've beaten my bengals in 2 super bowls. both of which were lost with roughly 30 seconds on the clock, with a bengals lead, aarrgghh.
the cowboys the only thing i have against them, is the same thing as the braves. nobodies america's team. they are that communities team, and what other fan support they carry. jmho.

Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:32 pm
by d-5
OZZIEOHIO wrote:I thought the Steelers got the bad calls.
You must not have watched the same game I did

Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:17 pm
by qualified101
roughing the qb call was questionable but the holding call that gave the cards a safety was just as bogus.
clearly was fumble at the end. the ball was out before arm was going forward, when arm went forward it kind of punched the ball forward making it look like an attemted pass. jmo
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:47 pm
by kcarth305
This game came down to the penalties. Simple as that. Arizona scored too early with 2:35 (I believe) left on the clock. Scoring with 2:35 left gave the Steelers a lot of time to work with. They took full advantage of it and it paid of in a big way. Holmes pulled through BIG in this game. Yes, it could have very well been Ward, but with his injury, Holmes was in his place.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:47 pm
by Bassmaster
Both teams had their share of good and bad calls that didn't determine the outcome of the game. Great teams play above the officiating and go get the win

Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:50 pm
by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
AW, HORSE HOCKEY. THE GAME WINNING TOUCHDOWN THE LEFT FOOT WAS NOT DOWN.
Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:51 pm
by OZZIEOHIO
His left foot was down.

Re: Good Super Bowl or Bad Super Bowl????
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:58 pm
by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
GOD BLESS YOU OZ, AND I SAW THAT REAL TIME, NOBODY BELIEVED ME.