Page 1 of 1

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:53 pm
by WitnessProtection
He should have plenty of time to Tweet since the Bengal defense spends 90% of the game on the field anyway.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:44 pm
by ace63
But when he scores 2 tds againest browns , Its ok to tweet

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:27 pm
by noreply66
Wide receivers?????????

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:35 pm
by ace63
He doesnt lead the nfl in dropped balls. Guess what wr does . And didnt get to probowl that many times without being good. He does have a mouth.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:23 pm
by ace63
If he scores tds who cares.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:00 pm
by ace63
gahs4ever wrote:Certainly not the Cincinnati Criminals



I dont think any cinci players have killed anyone yet. Browns rap sheet is 4 fold that of cinci. Thas because they have been around longer. do the math.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:19 pm
by ace63
Let me explain in simple terms you can understand. If browns had a team 50 years before cinci , the would have more because cinci didnt even have a team. You cant compare them unless the had the same amount of time . Its easy math .

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:28 pm
by ace63
gahs4ever wrote:Browns in the NFL 1950-present minus three years = 55 years

Bengals in the NFL 1969 to present = 39 years

Difference 16 years. So according to your math that 16 year difference explains 15 more HOFers?

Try again


True because they only had 6,8 12 teams. It was easy back them . It was just like a divison win.
Try it today ,
Not happening

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:41 pm
by dazed&confused
ace63 wrote:
gahs4ever wrote:Browns in the NFL 1950-present minus three years = 55 years

Bengals in the NFL 1969 to present = 39 years

Difference 16 years. So according to your math that 16 year difference explains 15 more HOFers?

Try again


True because they only had 6,8 12 teams. It was easy back them . It was just like a divison win.
Try it today ,
Not happening


One thing I will say about this particular argument is imagine the concentrated talent level that would result if we only had 12 teams today. Any team that made the playoffs would be a real legitimate contender. ANY playoff win would be very tough.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:25 pm
by fuzzhead
I personally think the NFL needs to expand the number of playoff qualifiers from 6 to 8. . . too many good teams are getting snubed.
Let it be 1 v. 8, 2 v. 7, etc. . .

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:57 pm
by ace63
gahs4ever wrote:Browns in the NFL 1950-present minus three years = 55 years

Bengals in the NFL 1969 to present = 39 years

Difference 16 years. So according to your math that 16 year difference explains 15 more HOFers?

Try again


Browns had a team in 1946. I guess that makes it longer , deluted lie to sway again.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:45 pm
by theassassin
fuzzhead wrote:I personally think the NFL needs to expand the number of playoff qualifiers from 6 to 8. . . too many good teams are getting snubed.
Let it be 1 v. 8, 2 v. 7, etc. . .



i have to disagree with you fuzz... i hve seen a lot of teams make the palyoffs with 8-8 record. wouldnt consider that a good team

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:13 am
by WitnessProtection
ace63 wrote:Let me explain in simple terms you can understand. If browns had a team 50 years before cinci , the would have more because cinci didnt even have a team. You cant compare them unless the had the same amount of time . Its easy math .



The main reason the Bengals only have one Hall of Famer is because, historically, the franchise has sucked.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:46 pm
by ace63
You mean like that other team who has done nothing for 46 years.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:30 pm
by ace63
Chad is the best wr on cinci right now. He is being a team player and trying to win . No he is not the chad of last year and is catching the tough passes. Hes back and cinci is proud to have him . Showing a lot of guts and a desire to win . It would have been bad to lose him to another team. Its just not my opinion, Watch the sport shows . I think they know more than us arm chair coaches. WHO-DEY baby

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:01 pm
by qualified101
no, not really. EVERY sports talk show had florida winning by 40-50 points over tennessee. lotta crow being eaten around espn, fox, and cbs.

Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:41 pm
by ace63
Chad doesnt work for fox,espn,cbs. He is a team player again and doing good. stats dont lie people do.
You just see it on the field baby.