Page 1 of 1

Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:03 pm
by cool cucumber
Will they win another game? They have a pretty tough schedule coming up what do you guys think?

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:06 pm
by iwearblacknikes
I think they will win at least 2 more games the rest of the season and that's it

Re: Browns?

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:11 am
by ace63
I heard they released joey gallaway, browns should pick him up. Then they should get jeff fisher for a coach if they release him at end of year. Then give him 4 years to rebuild. Draft a big name qb in up coming draft.
And thats all you have to do.

Re: Browns?

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:49 pm
by candystore
iwearblacknikes wrote:I think they will win at least 2 more games the rest of the season and that's it


thats to many...lol

Re: Browns?

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:14 pm
by west siders
nobody cares they suck anyway LOL!

Re: Browns?

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:47 pm
by dazed&confused
I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.

Re: Browns?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:18 pm
by candystore
dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.

:lol:

Re: Browns?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:34 pm
by 2trap_4ever
Right now Colt McCoy is thinking of another profession other than football.

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:03 am
by ace63
dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


Now, dont sugar coat it, Just tell us how you feel. ;-)

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:40 am
by Manwithplan
ace63 wrote:
dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


Now, dont sugar coat it, Just tell us how you feel. ;-)



I think what he's trying to say, is that, deep down inside, he is a die hard Steeler fan. ;-)

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:17 am
by ace63
I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:55 pm
by dazed&confused
manwithplan wrote:
ace63 wrote:
dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


Now, dont sugar coat it, Just tell us how you feel. ;-)



I think what he's trying to say, is that, deep down inside, he is a die hard Steeler fan. ;-)

Don't flatter yourself. I respect what the Steelers are but I would rather spit on my mother's grave than root for the Stoolers.

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:28 pm
by OZZIEOHIO
I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC


They need to wear brown bags over there heads at the resy of this years games.

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:37 pm
by dazed&confused
OZZIEOHIO wrote:
I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC


They need to wear brown bags over there heads at the resy of this years games.

They need to dress like empty seats and send a message to ownership!

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:58 pm
by Trivium5
OZZIEOHIO wrote:They need to dress like empty seats and send a message to ownership!


Haha, I like that one! :122245

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:28 pm
by pbuck
Maybe 1 more there horrible

Re: Browns?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:55 pm
by ace63
dazed&confused wrote:
OZZIEOHIO wrote:
I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC


They need to wear brown bags over there heads at the resy of this years games.

They need to dress like empty seats and send a message to ownership!


You know , you are right. If you keep the seats full while losing , why fix it quick. Fans do need to send a message. They pay the bills.

Re: Browns?

Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:45 pm
by dazed&confused
There is too much TV money for the owners. It has made the NFL what it is but it takes the pressure off the owners to field a good team. But let's see what an uncapped year brings. You may not be able to put the Genie back in the bottle. Teams that have an inherent advantage like New York, Dallas and New England will spend on free agents to get what they need to fill holes other teams can't. Goodbye Pittsburgh, Green Bay and Denver!

Re: Browns?

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:55 pm
by ace63
So how did the browns get a monday night game , with only winning 4 games ?????????????

Re: Browns?

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:48 pm
by dazed&confused
Woo-hoo!!!!! Browns didn't get embarassed this weekend! Well, at least NOT ON THE FIELD! :oops: