New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
- WitnessProtection
- All Conference
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:39 pm
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
He should have plenty of time to Tweet since the Bengal defense spends 90% of the game on the field anyway.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
He doesnt lead the nfl in dropped balls. Guess what wr does . And didnt get to probowl that many times without being good. He does have a mouth.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
gahs4ever wrote:Certainly not the Cincinnati Criminals
I dont think any cinci players have killed anyone yet. Browns rap sheet is 4 fold that of cinci. Thas because they have been around longer. do the math.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
Let me explain in simple terms you can understand. If browns had a team 50 years before cinci , the would have more because cinci didnt even have a team. You cant compare them unless the had the same amount of time . Its easy math .
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
gahs4ever wrote:Browns in the NFL 1950-present minus three years = 55 years
Bengals in the NFL 1969 to present = 39 years
Difference 16 years. So according to your math that 16 year difference explains 15 more HOFers?
Try again
True because they only had 6,8 12 teams. It was easy back them . It was just like a divison win.
Try it today ,
Not happening
- dazed&confused
- SEOPS HO
- Posts: 9288
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
- Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
ace63 wrote:gahs4ever wrote:Browns in the NFL 1950-present minus three years = 55 years
Bengals in the NFL 1969 to present = 39 years
Difference 16 years. So according to your math that 16 year difference explains 15 more HOFers?
Try again
True because they only had 6,8 12 teams. It was easy back them . It was just like a divison win.
Try it today ,
Not happening
One thing I will say about this particular argument is imagine the concentrated talent level that would result if we only had 12 teams today. Any team that made the playoffs would be a real legitimate contender. ANY playoff win would be very tough.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
I personally think the NFL needs to expand the number of playoff qualifiers from 6 to 8. . . too many good teams are getting snubed.
Let it be 1 v. 8, 2 v. 7, etc. . .
Let it be 1 v. 8, 2 v. 7, etc. . .
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
gahs4ever wrote:Browns in the NFL 1950-present minus three years = 55 years
Bengals in the NFL 1969 to present = 39 years
Difference 16 years. So according to your math that 16 year difference explains 15 more HOFers?
Try again
Browns had a team in 1946. I guess that makes it longer , deluted lie to sway again.
- theassassin
- All State
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 5:48 pm
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
fuzzhead wrote:I personally think the NFL needs to expand the number of playoff qualifiers from 6 to 8. . . too many good teams are getting snubed.
Let it be 1 v. 8, 2 v. 7, etc. . .
i have to disagree with you fuzz... i hve seen a lot of teams make the palyoffs with 8-8 record. wouldnt consider that a good team
- WitnessProtection
- All Conference
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:39 pm
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
ace63 wrote:Let me explain in simple terms you can understand. If browns had a team 50 years before cinci , the would have more because cinci didnt even have a team. You cant compare them unless the had the same amount of time . Its easy math .
The main reason the Bengals only have one Hall of Famer is because, historically, the franchise has sucked.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
You mean like that other team who has done nothing for 46 years.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
Chad is the best wr on cinci right now. He is being a team player and trying to win . No he is not the chad of last year and is catching the tough passes. Hes back and cinci is proud to have him . Showing a lot of guts and a desire to win . It would have been bad to lose him to another team. Its just not my opinion, Watch the sport shows . I think they know more than us arm chair coaches. WHO-DEY baby
- qualified101
- SEO
- Posts: 2565
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:07 pm
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
no, not really. EVERY sports talk show had florida winning by 40-50 points over tennessee. lotta crow being eaten around espn, fox, and cbs.
Re: New Name....Same Old Chad Johnson
Chad doesnt work for fox,espn,cbs. He is a team player again and doing good. stats dont lie people do.
You just see it on the field baby.
You just see it on the field baby.