Browns?

Post Reply
User avatar
cool cucumber
All Conference
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:36 pm

Browns?

Post by cool cucumber »

Will they win another game? They have a pretty tough schedule coming up what do you guys think?


iwearblacknikes
S
Posts: 1675
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:29 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by iwearblacknikes »

I think they will win at least 2 more games the rest of the season and that's it


ace63
SE
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:34 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by ace63 »

I heard they released joey gallaway, browns should pick him up. Then they should get jeff fisher for a coach if they release him at end of year. Then give him 4 years to rebuild. Draft a big name qb in up coming draft.
And thats all you have to do.


User avatar
candystore
Varsity
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:42 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by candystore »

iwearblacknikes wrote:I think they will win at least 2 more games the rest of the season and that's it


thats to many...lol


User avatar
west siders
All State
Posts: 1206
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:32 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by west siders »

nobody cares they suck anyway LOL!


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: Browns?

Post by dazed&confused »

I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


User avatar
candystore
Varsity
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:42 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by candystore »

dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.

:lol:


2trap_4ever
S
Posts: 1682
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:55 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by 2trap_4ever »

Right now Colt McCoy is thinking of another profession other than football.


ace63
SE
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:34 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by ace63 »

dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


Now, dont sugar coat it, Just tell us how you feel. ;-)


Manwithplan
All State
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:48 am

Re: Browns?

Post by Manwithplan »

ace63 wrote:
dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


Now, dont sugar coat it, Just tell us how you feel. ;-)



I think what he's trying to say, is that, deep down inside, he is a die hard Steeler fan. ;-)


ace63
SE
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:34 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by ace63 »

I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: Browns?

Post by dazed&confused »

manwithplan wrote:
ace63 wrote:
dazed&confused wrote:I can't stand it anymore. I've been a Browns fan since 1968 but this team tests the will of even the greatest fans. This is worse than the 70's. I even miss Fair Hooker. I actually blame the spineless NFL for allowing Modell to move the franchise. It's a franchise, not a family heirloom. If you can't make a go of it, sell it to someone who can. Instead, we are granted a facsimile of the original team sold to the highest bidder who, maybe with the greatest intentions, can't figure out how to hire football people and put them in charge of the team. I'm suspending my interest in the team pending a change in ownership or a change in dumb luck that will allow us to have at least a competitive team, if not a winner. I'd rather have watched the Steelers/Vikings game instead of that dog that FOX 28 served up.


Now, dont sugar coat it, Just tell us how you feel. ;-)



I think what he's trying to say, is that, deep down inside, he is a die hard Steeler fan. ;-)

Don't flatter yourself. I respect what the Steelers are but I would rather spit on my mother's grave than root for the Stoolers.


OZZIEOHIO
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8384
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:21 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by OZZIEOHIO »

I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC


They need to wear brown bags over there heads at the resy of this years games.


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: Browns?

Post by dazed&confused »

OZZIEOHIO wrote:
I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC


They need to wear brown bags over there heads at the resy of this years games.

They need to dress like empty seats and send a message to ownership!


Trivium5
Freshman Team
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by Trivium5 »

OZZIEOHIO wrote:They need to dress like empty seats and send a message to ownership!


Haha, I like that one! :122245


User avatar
pbuck
All State
Posts: 1396
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:08 am

Re: Browns?

Post by pbuck »

Maybe 1 more there horrible


ace63
SE
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:34 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by ace63 »

dazed&confused wrote:
OZZIEOHIO wrote:
I was watching the browns report last night. They said the fans have one of the harestest choices they have to make for the up coming home games. PAPER OR PLASTIC


They need to wear brown bags over there heads at the resy of this years games.

They need to dress like empty seats and send a message to ownership!


You know , you are right. If you keep the seats full while losing , why fix it quick. Fans do need to send a message. They pay the bills.


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: Browns?

Post by dazed&confused »

There is too much TV money for the owners. It has made the NFL what it is but it takes the pressure off the owners to field a good team. But let's see what an uncapped year brings. You may not be able to put the Genie back in the bottle. Teams that have an inherent advantage like New York, Dallas and New England will spend on free agents to get what they need to fill holes other teams can't. Goodbye Pittsburgh, Green Bay and Denver!


ace63
SE
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:34 pm

Re: Browns?

Post by ace63 »

So how did the browns get a monday night game , with only winning 4 games ?????????????


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: Browns?

Post by dazed&confused »

Woo-hoo!!!!! Browns didn't get embarassed this weekend! Well, at least NOT ON THE FIELD! :oops:


Post Reply

Return to “Pro Sports”