:122246FIDO wrote: IF THE BABY IS UGLY, CALL THE BABY UGLY!! Someone needs to LIGHT a fire or expect more of the same each game!!


:122246FIDO wrote: IF THE BABY IS UGLY, CALL THE BABY UGLY!! Someone needs to LIGHT a fire or expect more of the same each game!!
Hopefullly you are not refering to Burg being a bad team. They are not a power house but they are far from being bad.biggdowgg wrote:5 turnovers for Portsmouth again,,,,even the bad teams will beat you with that many turnovers
thats not what I meant at all,,,,,we have had 4 turnovers or more in the first 3 games,,,Im saying you can not beat ANYONE with turnovers like thatwobycat wrote:Hopefullly you are not refering to Burg being a bad team. They are not a power house but they are far from being bad.biggdowgg wrote:5 turnovers for Portsmouth again,,,,even the bad teams will beat you with that many turnovers
Burg also had three turnovers. All lost. Portsmouth had no chance at winning this game tonight. They only had four first downs up
until the their last 2 scores, when burg went a little lax thinking the game was out of reach. Portsmouth has some nice weapons but they play with no emotion or discipline.
Bounce wrote:It is what it is, Football don't start in June its a all year around sport now with the extra conditioniong programs offered for athletes in our area. Portsmouth has the total package from facilities to skilled players but when your getting pushed around week after week year after year by schools that shouldn't even be on the field with you something is missing. Dedication to your program to get better as a player and team. We can blame coaches all we want and not to say some blames needs to fall that way. But the player needs to be held accountable for their lack of commitment to the program of getting bigger and faster during the off season.
Do you think that Bob Lutz gets all "football players"? I bet most coaches from the area that have successful programs turn "athletes" into football players. Portsmouth has had a bunch of good athletes and football players in the past 6 years. Hell, they sent several linemen to D1 college programs and still didnt have much of a running game!Trojan_FB_Alum wrote:OK, everyone keeps talking about all the athletes we have. We do have some but they are NOT FOOTBALL players. They are guys with speed they decided to play football. Wayne Evans is a basketball first guy, Zaide hasn’t played a complete football season since his freshmen year, Dion and Duke both have limited football experience with them both only playing a few games as sophomores then not playing last year.
We may be able to overcome this if we had a big experienced offensive line to run behind. We do not. We start 2 sophomores in Alex Grashel, and Nate Basham, a first year starter in Tyler Scott, then seniors JW Horsely and Kyle Ratcliff. Their weights are 230, 180, 270, 206 240 averaging 225 pounds a man, remove the one big guy in Tyler Scott and the other four drop to an average of 214. West had running backs bigger than this. This make it hard to find a run game when we are young and inexperienced up front, and we have inexperienced running backs, even though they may be good athletes.
I’m sorry but we do not have the guys everyone thinks we have, good athletes yes, good kids yes, football experience NO, size NO. Plan and simple we do not have the studs everyone thinks we have.
The spread is a real spread, and it is NOT the same we always ran just from the gun. Watch the offensive line play, we do not block the same way. For years we made a living on counter trey, and traps, we very rarely see any movement from the offensive line now. We try to use the spread to spread the defense out and create running lanes now instead of the old trap and counter game we used to make a living on. I would like to be able to get out of the spread and get back to the ace split back and I sets, but again with inexperience, and undersized linemen it would be very hard to run the old offense.