ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post Reply
FANOSPORTS
SEOPS
Posts: 5077
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: NORTH OF EDEN

ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by FANOSPORTS »

Zanesville had a 48-43 lead with 1:00 to go and lost 51-50. It looks like no team south of I-70 will win a title unless Moeller can do it in D1 and that's very doubtful. Dayton Dunbar beat Cleveland Benedictine tonight in the earlier DII game 69-62 and they'll probably kill Port Clinton who's never even been past District's till this year.


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by TribeManiac10 »

Moeller has a shot, they definately have Mentor in the size department.


User avatar
dimedrop4
All State
Posts: 1310
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by dimedrop4 »

Mentor is one thing. On the other hand, nobody will beat Gahanna Lincoln. Just sayin. :lol:


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by TribeManiac10 »

dimedrop4 wrote:Mentor is one thing. On the other hand, nobody will beat Gahanna Lincoln. Just sayin. :lol:

Yeh, I dont like their odds against the team that rolled over the #1 team in the nation. But its possible....much stranger things have happened in some choice basketball tournys this season.


The Wizard
Freshman Team
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:10 pm

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by The Wizard »

FANOSPORTS wrote:Zanesville had a 48-43 lead with 1:00 to go and lost 51-50. It looks like no team south of I-70 will win a title unless Moeller can do it in D1 and that's very doubtful. Dayton Dunbar beat Cleveland Benedictine tonight in the earlier DII game 69-62 and they'll probably kill Port Clinton who's never even been past District's till this year.


Isn't Dayton south of I-70??


zbd
Freshman Team
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:39 pm

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by zbd »

Just want to say GREAT JOB BLUE it was fun while it lasted!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!


earp
S
Posts: 1710
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:03 pm

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by earp »

Dont ever underestimate Big Moe!They are tough out any year!


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by TribeManiac10 »

earp wrote:Dont ever underestimate Big Moe!They are tough out any year!

Yeh they have a longer history of success than Gahanna and are much larger in the post, but then again...so was Northland.


tropical breeze
Riding the Bench
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:30 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by tropical breeze »

Gahanna is one of the athletic teams I've seen in a while. That said, I didn't see them play Northland. Quick and very aggressive and 6'3" and 6'4" kids jump out of the gym. They should be favored, but heck anything can happen in a one and done.


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by TribeManiac10 »

tropical breeze wrote:Gahanna is one of the athletic teams I've seen in a while. That said, I didn't see them play Northland. Quick and very aggressive and 6'3" and 6'4" kids jump out of the gym. They should be favored, but heck anything can happen in a one and done.

Gahanna is the favorite in this one but if Moeller can get Griffin Mckenzie involved in the post they could make it very interesting.


User avatar
dimedrop4
All State
Posts: 1310
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by dimedrop4 »

Looks like I was wrong. Gahanna Lincoln went down last night in defeat 62-50. The mighty have fallen once again!


Philos_Finest
All Conference
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 12:13 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by Philos_Finest »

Massilon Jackson was by far the best team up there & they showed that against Moeller. Jackson's two bigs are going to Kent State & Akron.


sparky
All State
Posts: 1491
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 11:00 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by sparky »

i am glad some of you guys aren't fortune tellers. that is why they play the games on the court and not on paper. ask all of the number one seeds in the ncaa. go baylor.


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: ZANESVILLE (17-6) vs. PORT CLINTON (25-0)

Post by TribeManiac10 »

Philos_Finest wrote:Massilon Jackson was by far the best team up there & they showed that against Moeller. Jackson's two bigs are going to Kent State & Akron.

I wish Northland and them would have met up. I dont think the Vikings would have had as many problems in the post as Lincoln and Moeller did. IMO Griffin McKenzie and company did not show up against the polar bears and the big rebounding differential shows that. Sullinger/Weatherspoon/Robinson vs. Henninger/Egner would have been a better show.


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”