no , its not all about 1 game . thats silly . make your argument if you wish but it's back of the YEAR , not back of the GAME .fbnut wrote:It's all about how you play in the big game.
SOC II Player of the Year
-
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 7840
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:18 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
I still think Howard's defensive efforts are being dismissed. I think the way he has played defensively, along with his offensive accomplishments puts him at the top of the list with Miller. No doubt, Miller's offensive numbers are special... He's a darn good player! Burg's offensive style is going to lead to bigger offensive numbers for the position. I just think there is something to be said for a guy that has been special on both sides of the ball. He's also taken care of the ball in an amazing way. It's just not an open and shut case in my opinion.... If it were offensive back of the year, or offensive player of the year then Miller would win hands down. That being said, best of luck to the Burg tonight! Go SOC!
-
- S
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Wobycat,
Miller did NOT rush for 168 against Valley. He didnt even sniff 100. If we're going to have an honest conversation, lets stick with facts only please. It's already been established that Miller put up better numbers than Howard, so lets not embellish any.
Miller did NOT rush for 168 against Valley. He didnt even sniff 100. If we're going to have an honest conversation, lets stick with facts only please. It's already been established that Miller put up better numbers than Howard, so lets not embellish any.
- YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 25696
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: WAVERLY, OHIO
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
i ain't seen the numbers yet on patrick lewis, and those will be with johnson central, ky/columbus bishop watterson/columbus bishop hartley not even kicking to him.but they must just be mind boggling, i ain't gonna lie, all i've seen is ironton and it's opponents this year. aside from 1 game with valley/minford. but he has ole bait's vote. this kid is something special. and a great kid/christian to boot.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 7:37 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Hey bait, not picking at you but when Ironton gets voted into the SOCII in a couple of years, your backs will have a shot at the SOC II POY.. 

- YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 25696
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: WAVERLY, OHIO
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
again my apologies i have repeatedly been hit about the face and head area. i thought this was a seop player of the year, i looked at it wrong.
- YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 25696
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: WAVERLY, OHIO
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
LIKE MY PAPPY BAIT USED TO ALWAYS SAID TO ME, SON------------THAT'S WHAT HE CALLS ME, SON
YOU CAN'T DO NOTHIN WRONG
IF YOU AIN'T DOIN ANYTHING.
YOU CAN'T DO NOTHIN WRONG
IF YOU AIN'T DOIN ANYTHING.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 7:37 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
No worries...The closer I get to 50 the less I can see and hear! 8)You're Tiger Bait wrote:again my apologies i have repeatedly been hit about the face and head area. i thought this was a seop player of the year, i looked at it wrong.
I'd say Miller takes the trophy this year.
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Here's what you are looking for....You're Tiger Bait wrote:again my apologies i have repeatedly been hit about the face and head area. i thought this was a seop player of the year, i looked at it wrong.
http://southeasternohiopreps.com/forum/ ... =1&t=93527
.... and you don't need to keep repeating the obvious.

.
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
So, you're saying that Miller didn't play defense ? I thought I read where he had 7 tackles in the Valley game.crab_apple4 wrote:I still think Howard's defensive efforts are being dismissed. I think the way he has played defensively, along with his offensive accomplishments puts him at the top of the list with Miller. No doubt, Miller's offensive numbers are special... He's a darn good player! Burg's offensive style is going to lead to bigger offensive numbers for the position. I just think there is something to be said for a guy that has been special on both sides of the ball. He's also taken care of the ball in an amazing way. It's just not an open and shut case in my opinion.... If it were offensive back of the year, or offensive player of the year then Miller would win hands down.
He was just so outstanding offensively his defense was overlooked a lot.
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
starbase_318 wrote:No worries...The closer I get to 50 the less I can see and hear! 8)You're Tiger Bait wrote:again my apologies i have repeatedly been hit about the face and head area. i thought this was a seop player of the year, i looked at it wrong.
I'd say Miller takes the trophy this year.
You haven't hit 50 YET???

-
- S
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Actually I believe he's saying Howard is a better defensive player than Miller. I also understood him to believe Miller was a better offensive player. I further understood him to discuss the award is not meant for ONLY offense or defense.wink wrote:So, you're saying that Miller didn't play defense ? I thought I read where he had 7 tackles in the Valley game.crab_apple4 wrote:I still think Howard's defensive efforts are being dismissed. I think the way he has played defensively, along with his offensive accomplishments puts him at the top of the list with Miller. No doubt, Miller's offensive numbers are special... He's a darn good player! Burg's offensive style is going to lead to bigger offensive numbers for the position. I just think there is something to be said for a guy that has been special on both sides of the ball. He's also taken care of the ball in an amazing way. It's just not an open and shut case in my opinion.... If it were offensive back of the year, or offensive player of the year then Miller would win hands down.
He was just so outstanding offensively his defense was overlooked a lot.
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Just the facts!Jesco White wrote:Wobycat,
Miller did NOT rush for 168 against Valley. He didnt even sniff 100. If we're going to have an honest conversation, lets stick with facts only please. It's already been established that Miller put up better numbers than Howard, so lets not embellish any.
http://www.maxpreps.com/contests/_391fT ... rsburg.htm
-
- SEOPS HO
- Posts: 9605
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:34 am
- Location: On The Ridge
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
I don't know where they got those stats but I sure don't remember Eddie ripping off a 77 yard run.wobycat wrote:Just the facts!Jesco White wrote:Wobycat,
Miller did NOT rush for 168 against Valley. He didnt even sniff 100. If we're going to have an honest conversation, lets stick with facts only please. It's already been established that Miller put up better numbers than Howard, so lets not embellish any.
http://www.maxpreps.com/contests/_391fT ... rsburg.htm
According to BurgFan.com, which I would trust more than MaxPreps, the Pirates only had 129 total rushing yards on 35 attempts with a long of 38 yards.
http://football.burgfan.com/Tradition/S ... lFrame.htm
-
- S
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Since when did Maxpreps represent "the facts"??wobycat wrote:Just the facts!Jesco White wrote:Wobycat,
Miller did NOT rush for 168 against Valley. He didnt even sniff 100. If we're going to have an honest conversation, lets stick with facts only please. It's already been established that Miller put up better numbers than Howard, so lets not embellish any.
http://www.maxpreps.com/contests/_391fT ... rsburg.htm

Look, if I had a vote, it would go to Miller. At the same time, I understand where a case can be made for Howard. I don't need to rely on alleged facts reported by people who weren't even at the game(s) to tell me what I've witnessed with my own eyes, not to mention the stats reported by 3 other sources who were at the game don't even come close to agreeing. Maxpreps is wrong all the time, but you keep on believing. Those "facts" aren't even as valuable as the dust cloth Valley will use to keep the GOLD FOOTBALL that Howard led them to that night anyway. My Burg friends know I have respect, so they'll understand that last remark 8)
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Jesco White wrote:Actually I believe he's saying Howard is a better defensive player than Miller. I also understood him to believe Miller was a better offensive player. I further understood him to discuss the award is not meant for ONLY offense or defense.wink wrote:So, you're saying that Miller didn't play defense ? I thought I read where he had 7 tackles in the Valley game.crab_apple4 wrote:I still think Howard's defensive efforts are being dismissed. I think the way he has played defensively, along with his offensive accomplishments puts him at the top of the list with Miller. No doubt, Miller's offensive numbers are special... He's a darn good player! Burg's offensive style is going to lead to bigger offensive numbers for the position. I just think there is something to be said for a guy that has been special on both sides of the ball. He's also taken care of the ball in an amazing way. It's just not an open and shut case in my opinion.... If it were offensive back of the year, or offensive player of the year then Miller would win hands down.
He was just so outstanding offensively his defense was overlooked a lot.
Seems you're always telling us what other people "mean". Just like when a poster said that Valley hadn't beat Wheelersburg at Valley in 40 years and you followed his post with....."What he 'meant' was ....two or three paragraphs of blah, blah, blah....." which nobody really cared about.
And as far as "facts" go, nobody bends and spins the "facts" more than the Valley clan. .... so give us a break and try letting people speak for themselves..

Re: SOC II Player of the Year
I stand corrected on stats. but overall Miller did better in statistics. so well he probably will end up player of region. I'm done with the argument. I'm exhausted plus I'm a grown man, although I haven't acted like one. good luck valley against grove.
-
- S
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Nice response there Mr. Google or Mr. Wikipedia or Mr. Know-it -all. Is that the best you have??
Have you always been good at reading other peoples minds or is this something new for you.
Have you always been good at reading other peoples minds or is this something new for you.
-
- S
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am
Re: SOC II Player of the Year
Since my last post was deleted, I'll repost...
Have YOU always been infatuated with me? Or, did that just start last year?

Have YOU always been infatuated with me? Or, did that just start last year?

