Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3745
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
Medina, who was #9 in Region 1 computer points at 9.89 averaged out points, beat St Edward last night. St Edward was #1 in Region 1 computer points at 36.53
And to think, if it was only eight entrants this year... this wouldn’t have happened.
And to think, if it was only eight entrants this year... this wouldn’t have happened.
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
Man I got on here to post about this very subject. Look a little deeper and found one that might top that.formerfcfan wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:20 am Medina, who was #9 in Region 1 computer points at 9.89 averaged out points, beat St Edward last night. St Edward was #1 in Region 1 computer points at 36.53
And to think, if it was only eight entrants this year... this wouldn’t have happened.
Division II Region 6---North Royalton Bears seeded #22 and they went 0-6 on the year. They just beat the #11 seed last week and #6 seeded Olmsted Falls who had 17.5 points and ranked 6th in the region. Won the game in OT.
Region 3---New Albany Eagles 3-3 on the season and ranked #11 in region with 9.1 points, just traveled to Pickerington North 5-1 in season and 26 computer points and just rocked them 44-20.
Region 10---West Holmes Knights ranked 14th in points and seeded 12 defeated Lodi Cloverleaf ranked #4 in region and 5 seed, 38-21.
Is there more lopsided wins than there is these types of examples absolutely but there's always THAT team who could pull off an upset or 2. So here we are a team that didn't win a game in season has now gone on the road and pulled out the win in the 1st, 2 rounds of the playoffs. LOVE IT.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3745
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
I think there’s an argument to be made that letting everyone in, or an expansion of entrants, makes sense for larger divisions but not smaller. The Ohio Capital Conference and certainly a couple leagues near Cleveland are incredibly competitive with lots of parity.
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
Well, as you probably already know starting next year the top 12 get in. So a team like Medina mentioned above at the 9 seed would make it in, personally I wish it would have stayed at 8 per region. Playoffs should be a reward for having a good season, the more teams allowed in just waters it down and makes the 10 games seem almost like scrimmages.
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
While I agree that those do seem to be impressive wins, one could argue; How were these wins attainable? Were they wins because the stronger team was having pandemic issues with some players? I for sure don't know either way, but, were both teams were playing at their full strength? Also does some teams benefit from not having a full season (ie. were they never exposed)? or, did some teams never get fully going by not having a full season? I am truly not trying take your argument away because you many very well be correct, but to make those arguments in just one season, especially in a season with so many variables it's hard for me accept.....yet.
I will say though, that when OHSAA went to 8 teams....Ironton was an 8th and was a state runner-up...
I will say though, that when OHSAA went to 8 teams....Ironton was an 8th and was a state runner-up...
There's the BURG....then there's everyone else!
[img][/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Xr29B08bBPw/T ... oll.jpgimg]
[img][/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Xr29B08bBPw/T ... oll.jpgimg]
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
Medina has a QB, Drew Allar, that is very highly regarded. He's getting some looks from major D1 programs, but I don't think he has many big time offers yet. I was still shocked to see that they knocked off St. Ed's.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:11 pm
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
Adding to this. After a 10 game schedule I am pretty confident the teams being talked about would be in the top 12 in their region in harbin points. In a normal year you have the non-league games that help the stronger conferences. With many teams playing only conference games, a 6th place team in a conference of larger schools could be one of the better teams in a region.Bumpy wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:53 am Well, as you probably already know starting next year the top 12 get in. So a team like Medina mentioned above at the 9 seed would make it in, personally I wish it would have stayed at 8 per region. Playoffs should be a reward for having a good season, the more teams allowed in just waters it down and makes the 10 games seem almost like scrimmages.
I don't want to see all teams get in the playoffs in a non-covid world. Makes the playoffs too long and in those first round match ups I think it really increases the chances of a serious injury.
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
If you're going to render the regular season completely meaningless, then don't have one. Start the tournament in week 1, then teams that lose can schedule games, or not.
-
- SEOPS HO
- Posts: 9605
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:34 am
- Location: On The Ridge
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
So, do the top 4 teams get a 1st round bye next year.
"Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends"
-
- All State
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:11 pm
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
Yes.
Season starts a week earlier than normal. Week 11 is a bye for top 4 teams in each region. Teams 5-8 host. Then 1-4 host in week 12.
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
I don’t think going to 12 teams will be bad especially for smaller divisions. It may be bad for southeastern Ohio but not the whole state. But everywhere you have a team who is a d-7 or d-6 team and they play in a league with a bunch of good d-5 teams and maybe play a D-4 team in non conference. This team may only be 5-5 and not be in top 8 in points but may actually be the better team I actually think when you get down to 8 teams in region that round of games will be better then they are now.
Re: Found the argument for letting everyone in playoffs
So you think the North Royalton Bears who were 0-6 in season would've been top 12 based on points?? Final 2 weeks of the year they were beat 62-14 and 53-0.teach1coach2 wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:58 amAdding to this. After a 10 game schedule I am pretty confident the teams being talked about would be in the top 12 in their region in harbin points. In a normal year you have the non-league games that help the stronger conferences. With many teams playing only conference games, a 6th place team in a conference of larger schools could be one of the better teams in a region.Bumpy wrote: Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:53 am Well, as you probably already know starting next year the top 12 get in. So a team like Medina mentioned above at the 9 seed would make it in, personally I wish it would have stayed at 8 per region. Playoffs should be a reward for having a good season, the more teams allowed in just waters it down and makes the 10 games seem almost like scrimmages.
I don't want to see all teams get in the playoffs in a non-covid world. Makes the playoffs too long and in those first round match ups I think it really increases the chances of a serious injury.