RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18926
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Philo lost 43-42 to Maysville in Week 6 then beat them 43-0 in playoffs.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:11 pm
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
I would prefer a Philo win in round 2, but I think the Brook is just a little too strong this year. Don't expect a blowout. Maybe a 35-21 score.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:35 pm
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Should be a heck of a game! If I remember right from the jamboree scrimmage, Philo had two drives deep into colts territory that resulted in a missed FG after the kicker was laid out as pass sailed off his hands. Then a made 35-40 yd FG.
Colts had one drive into Philo territory, don’t remember if it was a turnover on downs or a turnover. I expect a close game.
Colts had one drive into Philo territory, don’t remember if it was a turnover on downs or a turnover. I expect a close game.
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Philo is a resilient team. If they can limit Meadowbrook's big plays and force them to grind, then this has the makings to be a classic. Throw out the records, Philo is not your typical sub .500 team. This one will be a good one.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18926
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Meadowbrook has played a weaker schedule the mvl small was bad.
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 5077
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: NORTH OF EDEN
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Tough schedule, weak schedule. Philo lost the games they should have and Meadowbrook won the games they should have. Look for a good game. Meadowbrook by 10.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:35 pm
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Does Philo keep the momentum from their first complete game of the year or do they revert back to the penalty/turnover killing drives that haunted them in all their losses. I’m thinking they continue the momentum! Electrics by 10.
-
- S
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 7:58 pm
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Will watch this one on FB on Kaleb Graham's site. They do a great job with their production.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:28 am
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Anyone know what Meadowbrook brings to the table? GA is speed, speed, speed. Will this be a neutral site?
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18926
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
They are big and have a hell of a Qb.MisterGalliaGuy2016 wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:26 pm Anyone know what Meadowbrook brings to the table? GA is speed, speed, speed. Will this be a neutral site?
-
- All State
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:28 am
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Be interested to see how Gallia matches up against another team with some sizeEasternDspy wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:36 pmThey are big and have a hell of a Qb.MisterGalliaGuy2016 wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:26 pm Anyone know what Meadowbrook brings to the table? GA is speed, speed, speed. Will this be a neutral site?
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
They bring speed and good size on the line Game is at Meadowbrook.MisterGalliaGuy2016 wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:26 pm Anyone know what Meadowbrook brings to the table? GA is speed, speed, speed. Will this be a neutral site?
-
- SE
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 9:14 am
- Location: Ashland kentucky
Re: RD2: Philo (3-4) @ Meadowbrook (6-0)
Good size on the line spread offense style but they play more physical than most spread teams qb is tall and athletic and can throw the ball they also have good athletes at WR/RB strength is the offense but the defense is not bad eitherMisterGalliaGuy2016 wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:26 pm Anyone know what Meadowbrook brings to the table? GA is speed, speed, speed. Will this be a neutral site?
no competition don't gotta compete, I'm already winning this isn't defeat 