JV Scores 2022

[247sports]

Does anyone have any updates on JV scores?

[Tigernation2021]

I'll be honest I feel like most in that JV scores really mean nothing; some teams have freshman and sophomores playing varsity. A lot of teams don't have enough for a freshman team and those are the kid's playing JV against teams with Juniors on it. Waverly lost 28-20 to Piketon Saturday morning but we're playing a QB who hasn't played the position since pee wee which is why I just don't put that much stock into these scores.

[art_vandelay]

Only one I know of is Ironton over Burg 14-0.

Better question might be what area schools are actually fielding JV teams this year?*

[Rolltanks]

Unioto 24-6 vs vc
26-0 vs Amanda

[522Pirate]

Burg @ Coal Grove this evening…

[247sports]

Thanks for the input. In the Athens Co area I’ve heard that Eastern, NY, Athens, and Trimble have some JV games scheduled.

[mattash]

Rock Hill 14 Symmes Valley 12
Ironton 7 Jackson 0

[Easyrider]

Meigs 30 - Alexander 19

[BigBlueNation]

Northwest has wins over Southeastern and Huntington Ross. Not sure of scores both games they won comfortably.

[BillyBob21]

ND 40 - Green 14 tonight 8/29

[BigSpoon]

Ironton 7
Jackson 0

[Rza1]

8/29

Peake 14
Minford 12

[Rza1]

I'll be honest I feel like most in that JV scores really mean nothing; some teams have freshman and sophomores playing varsity. A lot of teams don't have enough for a freshman team and those are the kid's playing JV against teams with Juniors on it. Waverly lost 28-20 to Piketon Saturday morning but we're playing a QB who hasn't played the position since pee wee which is why I just don't put that much stock into these scores.

All about the kids gettin reps... you all may need that peewee qb to step in an win a game... nothing can replace game experience. The lack of jv/freshman games, combined with the running clock rules, have hurt the development of players.. I know nobody wants to get blown out..an most of the time it's uncomfortable for the winning team/coach.. but there's value in the minutes the kids are missing out on. Any respectable coach will call off the dawgs..get the next tier of kids some reps.. the game slows down an maybe the losing team can then play a more competitive quarter or 2... developing these kids into better players an better men is the objective.. an gettin reps, as many as possible, is the way to achieve this.. learning how to win and how to lose.....

[Tigernation2021]

I'll be honest I feel like most in that JV scores really mean nothing; some teams have freshman and sophomores playing varsity. A lot of teams don't have enough for a freshman team and those are the kid's playing JV against teams with Juniors on it. Waverly lost 28-20 to Piketon Saturday morning but we're playing a QB who hasn't played the position since pee wee which is why I just don't put that much stock into these scores.

All about the kids gettin reps... you all may need that peewee qb to step in an win a game... nothing can replace game experience. The lack of jv/freshman games, combined with the running clock rules, have hurt the development of players.. I know nobody wants to get blown out..an most of the time it's uncomfortable for the winning team/coach.. but there's value in the minutes the kids are missing out on. Any respectable coach will call off the dawgs..get the next tier of kids some reps.. the game slows down an maybe the losing team can then play a more competitive quarter or 2... developing these kids into better players an better men is the objective.. an gettin reps, as many as possible, is the way to achieve this.. learning how to win and how to lose.....

That's a spot-on post which is why to many people put stock in these JV scores, JV games are basically developmental games for the program's future.

[MrPerfect]

I'll be honest I feel like most in that JV scores really mean nothing; some teams have freshman and sophomores playing varsity. A lot of teams don't have enough for a freshman team and those are the kid's playing JV against teams with Juniors on it. Waverly lost 28-20 to Piketon Saturday morning but we're playing a QB who hasn't played the position since pee wee which is why I just don't put that much stock into these scores.

All about the kids gettin reps... you all may need that peewee qb to step in an win a game... nothing can replace game experience. The lack of jv/freshman games, combined with the running clock rules, have hurt the development of players.. I know nobody wants to get blown out..an most of the time it's uncomfortable for the winning team/coach.. but there's value in the minutes the kids are missing out on. Any respectable coach will call off the dawgs..get the next tier of kids some reps.. the game slows down an maybe the losing team can then play a more competitive quarter or 2... developing these kids into better players an better men is the objective.. an gettin reps, as many as possible, is the way to achieve this.. learning how to win and how to lose.....

You are exactly correct!

[247sports]

I like the dialogue. Makes sense. It sounds like if Fed Hock could have fielded a JV team then they would have at least been able to compete on that level. There were a bunch of Freshman that decided not to play because they knew they would be playing both sides of the ball and just didn’t have enough back up in upperclassman. The Varsity schedule was set last Fall for this season. JV is definitely a great option for teams with young players.

[mattash]

Burg 46 coal grove 0