slamdunk wrote:I commented earlier on another topic about this and will repeat. If there was too many kids out for the team, then a coach has a right to cut someone they feel will not make an impact on the team. "or" If the kid was a discipline problem, then the coach has every right to cut him. "BUT" If they have room on their roster and the kid was not a discipline problem, then the coach is TOTALLY WRONG!!!!
I am a coach myself and am extremely competitive. I want to win as much as any coach, but I would NEVER cut a kid if I had room on my roster for them. I might tell the kid that I don't know how much playing time they would get, but if they want to be on the team GREAT! Be upfront with the kid! I would also tell the kid that things change during the season and if there was improvement in him then playing time would increase. I am a STRONG advocate for giving every kid a chance. I would never and have never caved to a parent. It is about giving kids a chance.
I think the parental situations that may go on in Green is a NON ISSUE! This is about morals and being fair to kids! This situation really has fired me up because I don't have any stake or don't even know any one from Green. (Actually I am not sure where Green is!) I just can't understand what a coach could be thinking in a situation like this!
slamdunk,
I couldn't of said it better. I know that student in question at Green would of had an opportunity if he was in
Chillicothe, even as (Big of a School) as we are. We would of found room to insert him on the team. We take care of our kids here. As you can see above WITH THE EXAMPLE. One that is on the CAVS is disabled, missing a leg, but is very active in our Sports Programs. It doesn't make no sense at all, if there was room to add players to the Green Team, and instead there were cuts made. That's a no-brainer.
I hope the best for the
Green situation to conclude with all parties coming together to make it work.
Good Luck!