Has there ever been a scol girls team to score more than 153 points and not win the meet?
Has there been a school in the SEOAL that has scored more than 151 points and did not win the title?
scol & seoal highest score for a losing team
Re: scol & seoal highest score for a losing team
SEOAL - Boys
2007 - Warren - 156 points - 2nd place
Only one that I could find. Now that the SEOAL only places five individuals in each event since the amount of schools has gone down, we probably won't ever see two teams score over 150, might even be rare to see one school over 150. Point system used to go 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 but now it goes 8-6-4-2-1.
2007 - Warren - 156 points - 2nd place
Only one that I could find. Now that the SEOAL only places five individuals in each event since the amount of schools has gone down, we probably won't ever see two teams score over 150, might even be rare to see one school over 150. Point system used to go 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 but now it goes 8-6-4-2-1.
Re: scol & seoal highest score for a losing team
Chieftain2009 wrote:SEOAL - Boys
2007 - Warren - 156 points - 2nd place
Only one that I could find. Now that the SEOAL only places five individuals in each event since the amount of schools has gone down, we probably won't ever see two teams score over 150, might even be rare to see one school over 150. Point system used to go 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 but now it goes 8-6-4-2-1.
Wasn't it 6,4,3,2,1 for the league meet this year?
Re: scol & seoal highest score for a losing team
SCOL Yes in Girls 2009
2009
London 177.50 Washington CH 157
2009
London 177.50 Washington CH 157
Re: scol & seoal highest score for a losing team
I guess you're right, not sure where I got the 8 at.noreply66 wrote:Chieftain2009 wrote:SEOAL - Boys
2007 - Warren - 156 points - 2nd place
Only one that I could find. Now that the SEOAL only places five individuals in each event since the amount of schools has gone down, we probably won't ever see two teams score over 150, might even be rare to see one school over 150. Point system used to go 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 but now it goes 8-6-4-2-1.
Wasn't it 6,4,3,2,1 for the league meet this year?